DS architecture & tokens
Token systems, multi-brand and multi-product theming, mode strategy, foundation vs semantic vs component-level tokens, Figma variables vs Token Studio trade-offs.
I'm Vids, a design systems specialist. I work with design and engineering teams to build systems that product teams reach for by default - and that hold up past the launch party (the easy bit).
Most engagements start in one of these zones. Some stay there, some pull in all three.
Token systems, multi-brand and multi-product theming, mode strategy, foundation vs semantic vs component-level tokens, Figma variables vs Token Studio trade-offs.
LLM-ready design systems, Claude + Code Connect for Figma-to-code pipelines, DS as instruction sets, prompt-aware components, internal DS chatbots and doc tooling.
Coverage measurement, design-to-development handoff, branching workflows, snowflake component management, office hours and showcase rhythms, rollout sequencing.
Each card flips for the approach. Most engagements are framed as a problem and a sequence of decisions — not a sales pitch.
Reframed from 'how do we differentiate visually' to 'brand architecture inside a design system'. Walked through multi-brand patterns (Grab, Instagram/Threads), semantic-layer differentiation strategy, and snowflake component governance for product-specific UI.
Walked through Code Connect for Figma-to-code, internal DS chatbots, and concrete prompts the team could use. Filtered AI use cases against the maintenance overhead each would create.
Discussed LLM-ready DS principles: legible naming, predictable structure, machine-parseable docs. Mapped a coverage approach scaled to a 2-person team.
Strategy-level discussion on DS scope, sequencing, and team structure for an enterprise platform. Talked through coverage sequencing, governance models, and how to plan workshops for cross-team alignment.
Started with 'how do we reduce this?' and moved into broader architecture. Mapped reduction strategy to semantic naming, walked through a reference color system at scale, and discussed migration patterns.
Reframed the ask from 'central DS' to 'shared token layer + product-specific surfaces'. Worked through Token Studio multi-mode setup, semantic vs foundation token split, and a rollout sequence that didn't require freezing product work.
Connected DS strategy with AI prompting. Discussed how to shape components so they're prompt-friendly, and how to close the gap between generated screens and system fidelity.
Hands-on session through foundation tokens, component patterns, and a repeatable kickoff kit they could adapt per engagement.
Every engagement starts with a discovery call. We figure out the actual problem first - then I propose the right stream and what it costs. No fixed price list up front, because the fit matters more than the format.
A 30-min call with one or two of you. We dig into the actual problem you're trying to solve - not the format, not the fee, just the problem.
Based on that call, I propose a path: which stream fits, what the sessions cover, and the costing involved. Written, within 2 days.
We run the work in whichever stream we agreed on. Each session ends with a written follow-up - recommendations and references.
A final summary with next steps. If it makes sense to keep going, we scope the next stretch from there.
A focused 1:1 on a specific decision you're stuck on.
30–60 min, 1:1
A diagnostic-led working session with your design or DS team.
1–3 hrs, up to 7 people
A day on-site, mixing teaching with hands-on working sessions.
Half or full day, up to 15 people
Ongoing advisory for a DS initiative or transition.
2–4 sessions per month
By day, I lead design systems, accessibility, and AI-assisted design patterns at Keka HR - spanning core system, adoption, and AI tooling.
The advisory work is what I do independently - drawing on years of building, scaling, and occasionally rebuilding design systems. The deepest of those was a token system supporting multi-brand theming, mode strategy across 15+ products, and an in-house Token Studio to Flutter converter pipeline.
Being an active practitioner means I know which problems are theoretical and which ones actually block teams at 2pm on a Thursday.
Teams often ask for a specific solution when the actual problem is upstream. The first 30 minutes are usually about reframing the problem.
Token systems, governance models, adoption sequences should start with one or two components, not the full library. Run a POC, prove the workflow, then scale.
A DS that lives only in Figma is just a style guide. The interesting work is in the bridge — converters, naming, code-design parity, dev mode workflows.
Pick a time for a 25-min discovery call - we'll figure out the actual problem and whether we're a fit. If your situation needs a longer intro, send a note instead. I reply within 24 hours.